Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

Appeals Court Rules Most of Trump’s Tariffs Are Illegal

A U.S. appeals court ruled Aug. 29 that most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs are illegal, saying that he exceeded his authority, but the judges let the import taxes stay in place while allowing the case to be sent back to a lower court.

In a 7-4 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Trump’s reciprocal tariffs unveiled in April are mostly illegal.

The appeals court upheld a ruling handed down by the Court of International Trade earlier this year, saying that the president incorrectly used his emergency powers to issue the tariffs.

A majority of judges on the federal appeals court found the president overstepped his authority under a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

“The statute bestows significant authority on the President to undertake a number of actions in response to a declared national emergency, but none of these actions explicitly include the power to impose tariffs, duties, or the like, or the power to tax,” the court stated.

The court also said that it appears to be “unlikely that Congress intended, in enacting IEEPA, to depart from its past practice and grant the President unlimited authority to impose tariffs.”

“The statute neither mentions tariffs (or any of its synonyms) nor has procedural safeguards that contain clear limits on the President’s power to impose tariffs,” the judges added Friday.

Friday’s ruling will not take effect until Oct. 14, allowing the Trump administration to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Trump has made tariffs a pillar of U.S. foreign policy in his second term, saying they are a way to correct what he said are unfair trade practices by countries that export goods to the United States and to reshore manufacturing. He also used tariffs to target issues of drug trafficking, border security, and illegal immigration.

The tariffs have given the Trump administration leverage to extract economic concessions from trading partners but have also increased volatility in financial markets.

The president on Aug. 8 also warned on social media that serious economic consequences could follow if the court blocked the tariffs and the government from obtaining that revenue.

“It would be 1929 all over again, a GREAT DEPRESSION! If they were going to rule against the wealth, strength, and power of America, they should have done so LONG AGO, at the beginning of the case, where our entire Country, while never having a chance at this kind of GREATNESS again, would not have been put in 1929 style jeopardy,” Trump said at the time.

In April, Trump declared a national emergency because the U.S. imports much more than it exports, a phenomenon that has lasted for decades. Trump said the persistent trade deficit was undermining U.S. manufacturing capability and military readiness.

The president also said the tariffs against China, Canada, and Mexico were necessary to stop the flow of fentanyl and illegal immigrants from entering the United States.

The court’s decision on Friday does not impact tariffs issued under other legal authority, including Trump’s levies on steel and aluminum imports.

The New York-based U.S. Court of International Trade ruled against Trump’s tariff policies on May 28, saying the president had exceeded his authority when he imposed both sets of challenged tariffs. The appeals court stayed the lower court’s decision in June.

Reuters contributed to this report.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles